发新话题
打印

NetBeans vs Eclipse

NetBeans vs Eclipse

NetBeans vs Eclipse, 您更看好谁。

LOINC International @ Regenstrief Institute
CLISOL @ CHISS
LOINC Introduction @ OpenClinical
LexGrid Project @ Mayo

TOP

NetBeans vs Eclipse

Eclipse,功能更全点

TOP

NetBeans vs Eclipse

为什么Eclipse会
有一些负面的评价呢?比如,插件安装比较麻烦,对插件版本要求比较苛刻之类。
LOINC International @ Regenstrief Institute
CLISOL @ CHISS
LOINC Introduction @ OpenClinical
LexGrid Project @ Mayo

TOP

NetBeans vs Eclipse

有可能是开源的软件,简便性和易操作性稍微差点,你可以用带lomboz插件的ECLIPSE,主要是支持J2EE开发的,Eclipse功能太多,附带的负面影响就是需要许多插件。你可以根据你项目的需要,装所需要的插件

TOP

NetBeans vs Eclipse

我想ECLIPSE有丰富的插件满足不同的需要也是它的魅力所在吧

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/cn/java/l-eclipse/

TOP

NetBeans vs Eclipse

引用:

果然不错的内容,谢谢啦!

LOINC International @ Regenstrief Institute
CLISOL @ CHISS
LOINC Introduction @ OpenClinical
LexGrid Project @ Mayo

TOP

NetBeans vs Eclipse

个人观点:
虽然Eclipse的插件方式已经做到了尽量的简单,但的确在版本匹配方面总是会导致有些插件无法正常使用[不过除了因为版本的问题,还有一点就是要知道需要安装的插件还需要什么前提条件(安装其他必要的插件),相信有一定使用经验的人一定知道]。但是作为一个Eclipse的fans看中的反而是插件式的这种自由。而且插件的开发自由度相当大[有一点遗憾的是有些插件的开发需要对Java编程有较多的经验和领悟,插件的开发远不像示例那么简单]。这是其他大部分IDE往往不具备的特性。这个有点像Linux有什么自己弄上去就行了。但是远比Linux下面的东西要简单得多。

PS:Eclipse3.2 + EMF + GEF + WTP + BIRT + Tomcat Plugin +..... + Customize Plugin[其他插件不记的了,]不过总是在跟最新版本。

为了理想,我选择过放弃!同样为了理想,我选择坚持!天将降大任于斯人也!必将苦其心志,劳其筋骨,饿其体肤,空乏其身,行弗乱其所为,所以动心忍性,增益其所不能!

TOP

NetBeans vs Eclipse

OMG LQS

OMG TQS

Mayo MTS

HL7 CTS

关于术语服务(Terminology Services)研究、开发与参考实施的开源项目:

LexGrid

http://informatics.mayo.edu/LexGrid/index.php?page=

该项目使用了Eclipse

LOINC International @ Regenstrief Institute
CLISOL @ CHISS
LOINC Introduction @ OpenClinical
LexGrid Project @ Mayo

TOP

NetBeans vs Eclipse

http://informatics.mayo.edu/LexGrid/index.php?page=aboutlg

The Lexical Grid Vision - a distributed network of terminological resources

Currently, there are many terminologies and ontology's in existence.  But just about every terminology has its own format, its own set of tools, and its own update mechanisms.  The only thing that most of these pieces have in common with each other is their incompatibility.  This makes it very hard to use these resources to their full potential.  We have designed the Lexical Grid as a way to bridge terminologies and ontology's with a common set of tools, formats and update mechanisms.  The Lexical Grid is:

  • accessible through a set of common API's
  • joined through shared indices
  • online accessible
  • downloadable
  • loosely coupled
  • locally extendable
  • globally revised
  • available in web-space on web-time
  • cross-linked

The realization of this vision requires three interlocking components

  • Standards - access methods and formats need to be published and openly available
  • Tools - standards based tools must be readily available
  • Content - commonly used terminologies have to be available for access and download
LOINC International @ Regenstrief Institute
CLISOL @ CHISS
LOINC Introduction @ OpenClinical
LexGrid Project @ Mayo

TOP

NetBeans vs Eclipse

不知道是否有兴趣培育这样一个Community,进一步推动术语服务的研究、开发和应用?
LOINC International @ Regenstrief Institute
CLISOL @ CHISS
LOINC Introduction @ OpenClinical
LexGrid Project @ Mayo

TOP

Eclipse
生活,社会生活

TOP

发新话题